Okay, I’m going to exercise my little pea brain here and hope I don’t hurt myself in the process.
I’ve never claimed to be a mental giant when it comes to the economy. I was a political scientist through school and I don’t think I ever really took a business class, so my understanding of the economy and all its nuance isn’t what you would call extensive. That being said, I feel like I’ve always been pretty good with money and I make an effort to read up on economic happenings and understand them the best I can.
So here’s my questions:
As I understand it, the big problem with the economy right now is that banks don’t feel like they have the cash on hand to lend each other, which is a common activity and a critical element of our economy. I don’t quite understand the whole lending money back and forth between banks thing, but I’m sure there is a good reason for it, and obviously its needed for how our economy works. If I understand correctly, the lack of cash on hand is, at least in part, a result of the huge increase of people defaulting on their mortgages, which is keeping money out of the hands of the banks.
So if what I just laid out is accurrate, and if its not someone please enlighten me, why does the bailout plan not address that aspect of the problem. It sounds like the government just wants to give a crap-ton (technical term) of money to companies that screwed things up in the first place, hoping they’ll do better next time. That sounds like we’d be acting like an enabler around a recovering alcoholic.
Perhaps I’m way out of my league on this, but I just think if we don’t address the whole mortgage crises aspect its not going to fully correct the the problem, its just going to delay a continued decline. If someone can help me better understand it, I’d be in your debt.